E-Motos Clash with E-Bike Rules in Minnesota Suburbs

Last Updated on October 4, 2025 by Kristina

In Minnesota’s Twin Cities suburbs, a new challenge is emerging: “e-motos.” These machines are often sold or marketed as e-bikes, but they behave more like mini electric motorcycles. They can reach speeds well above legal e-bike limits, don’t always have pedals, and are stirring confusion, safety concerns, and enforcement challenges.

What the law says (or doesn’t)

• Under Minnesota law, a true electric-assisted bicycle must have operable pedals, a motor of 750 watts or less, and the motor must cut out at a certain speed (generally 28 mph in the “assist while pedaling” case).
• “E-motos” often skip pedals entirely or rely entirely on a throttle. They exceed that speed cap, pushing them into a ambiguous legal zone.
• Some suburbs are implementing local restrictions: Edina and Excelsior now require helmets for riders under 18 and limit e-bike use in downtown zones.
• In Eden Prairie, officials have opted more for education than blanket bans. The city tracks e-bike / scooter use, posts signage, and holds public awareness efforts.
• Police in several west metro areas report seeing machines going over 45 mph on city streets and paths.
• On mountain biking or trail systems, signs have appeared telling riders “No throttles allowed” and warning e-motos are barred.
• Some state legislators have introduced a bill (SF 3236) to require helmets for riders under 18 and disallow operation by those under 15.

Real-world issues & complaints

• Mountain biking groups report confrontations when e-motos mix into multiuse or natural-surface trails.
• Trail systems and parks say they cannot always enforce rules everywhere.
• Bike shop owners worry that e-motos are staining public perception of all e-bikes, making it harder to defend legal usage.
• Some of the same enforcement efforts are spilling into city streets: local police are trying to intercept high-speed riders, but it’s challenging when the distinction between e-bike and e-moto isn’t obvious.

---

My Take

Here’s what I see:

E-motos are a symptom of a gap between technological innovation and law/regulation. The devices are evolving faster than local rules can keep up. Because many people buy e-motos online, it’s difficult to police the marketplace or demand compliance. If communities respond with broad bans or vague rules, they risk penalizing legitimate e-bike users — people who ride responsibly, follow speed limits, and use pedal assistance.

So in my view:

• Education first: Local governments should invest in clear signage, public outreach, and guidance so riders understand which machines are legal.
• Clear definitions & enforcement: Lawmakers need to refine definitions (what counts as an e-bike vs an e-moto) and empower enforcement with tools to distinguish them (inspection, serial numbers, labels).
• Marketplace oversight: Because online sales are central to this issue, state and federal consumer protection authorities should play a role in regulating how these devices are marketed.
• Don’t punish all riders: Rules should avoid sweeping bans that restrict legal e-bike use. Instead, focus on the devices that truly exceed legal bounds.
• Trail and path management: Parks, local trail authorities, and municipalities should clarify which machines are allowed, post clear rules, and coordinate with law enforcement.

This is a delicate balancing act. E-bikes are a valuable tool for mobility, health, transportation equity. The growing presence of e-motos shouldn’t choke off that potential by creating overbroad backlash.

For more news on electric bikes click here

You May Also Like

• Chicago Struggles to Regulate E-Bikes and E-Motos as Safety Concerns Grow
• Grayslake, Illinois Cracks Down on E-Bikes and E-Scooters as Chicago Suburbs Tighten Rules
• Sartell, Minnesota Police Eye E-Bike and Scooter Ordinance After Surge in Complaints
• Minnesota’s E-Bike Rebate Revamp: A Fresh Start After Last Year’s Chaos
• Exploring the Sun Seeker E-Delta Electric Assist Trike