Colorado Springs E-Bike Policy Passes Narrow Vote, City Council Next
In a significant move for the cycling community, the Colorado Springs Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Advisory Board has narrowly approved a proposal to expand electric bike (e-bike) access on city trails. The decision, made on Thursday, marks a step forward in the ongoing debate over e-bike usage on public lands, though it remains to be seen if it will receive final approval from the City Council.
A Divided Decision
The policy change was not without controversy. The TOPS Working Committee, a separate body overseeing the city’s parks and open spaces, previously rejected the proposal. The committee raised concerns about an update to city code that would classify Class 1 and 2 e-bikes as “non-motorized” vehicles. The committee’s main objection was that the proposed change conflicted with the 1997 voter-approved TOPS ordinance, which prohibits motorized use on properties like Red Rock Canyon and Blodgett open spaces. Advocates for maintaining the original ordinance argue that allowing e-bikes on these lands would undermine its intent.
However, after hours of discussion, the advisory board voted 4-3 to define Class 1 and 2 e-bikes as “non-motorized use.” The proposal now includes allowing Class 1 e-bikes (which provide motorized boosts only when the rider is pedaling and are limited to speeds of 20 mph) on all trails where other bicycles are allowed. Class 2 e-bikes, which can be powered by throttle up to 20 mph, would be restricted to urban and commuter paths. Meanwhile, Class 3 e-bikes, with motors assisting riders up to 28 mph, would be classified as “motorized” and therefore prohibited from these trails.
The Controversy Over E-Bike Definitions
One of the main points of contention is the definition of e-bikes themselves. Parks board member Steve Lenzo expressed frustration with the distinction between Class 1 and 2 e-bikes—both of which are electric and share many similar characteristics—being labeled “non-motorized” while Class 3 bikes are classified as “motorized.” Lenzo argued that such definitions could confuse the public and diminish the government’s ability to communicate clearly about the policy.
Despite these concerns, board member Larry Bogue argued that it was time to move forward with a policy, acknowledging that several municipalities along Colorado’s Front Range had already established e-bike access on trails. Bogue emphasized the importance of recognizing the increasing number of e-bike riders on Colorado Springs trails and providing a clear policy framework for managing their presence.
Support for E-Bike Access
Supporters of the policy change say that e-bikes provide a valuable opportunity for people with disabilities, older adults, and those recovering from injury to continue enjoying cycling. Proponents argue that e-bikes can encourage physical activity and provide greater accessibility to outdoor recreation. Several people spoke at the meeting about how e-bikes had allowed them to return to group rides, improve their health, and enjoy the outdoors in ways they hadn’t been able to before.
Kent Drummond, a local e-bike rider, highlighted the contrast between concerns over e-bike speeds and the lack of alarm over fast-moving cars. He pointed out that focusing on speed alone fails to address rider behavior and the benefits that e-bikes bring to a diverse group of people.
Tom Lachocki, representing El Paso County’s parks board, further emphasized that the decision at hand was not about the bikes themselves but about whether to encourage or discourage physical activity in the community.
Opposition and Calls for a Public Vote
Despite the support, the proposal has not been universally embraced. Some advocates, including those from the Medicine Wheel Trail Advocates and Friends of Red Rock Canyon, have criticized the process, calling for a public vote on any changes to the TOPS ordinance. They argue that expanding e-bike access on certain properties should be a decision made directly by the voters, rather than through city policy changes alone.
Carol Beckman, a long-time parks advocate, echoed this sentiment, stating that while the proposed change might be legally permissible, it was not the best course of action. She and others have called for a more transparent process that includes input from the community and greater consideration of the long-term implications for the city’s parks and open spaces.
Next Steps: City Council and Beyond
While the Parks Board has approved the policy change, it is now up to the City Council to decide whether to move forward with the proposal. The Council could review the policy as early as next month. However, city officials have made it clear that even if the policy is approved, e-bikes will not be immediately permitted on all properties. Conservation easements and deed restrictions on certain parks, such as Palmer Park, prevent motorized use, which means the expanded access will initially apply only to urban trails and areas without such restrictions.
Parks Director Britt Haley suggested that the policy could be rolled out in phases, beginning with urban trails, providing time for staff to observe how e-bike riders interact with other trail users and ensuring that proper education and guidelines are in place. This phased approach is seen as a way to refine the policy before expanding e-bike access to more sensitive areas like TOPS properties.
A Path Forward
As the debate continues, it’s clear that e-bikes are becoming an increasingly important part of Colorado Springs’ outdoor landscape. The proposed policy change represents a significant shift in how the city views e-bike access, reflecting broader trends toward inclusion and accessibility in recreation. However, the path forward will require careful consideration, ongoing community input, and, perhaps, further adjustments to balance the needs of all trail users.
For now, all eyes will be on the City Council, as they prepare to weigh in on the issue that will shape the future of e-bikes in Colorado Springs.
What do you think about expanding e-bike access on Colorado Springs trails? Should the city adopt this new policy, or is a public vote necessary? Share your thoughts in the comments below and let’s continue the conversation about the future of cycling in our community!
For even more news on electric bikes click here
RELATED CONTENT
Kristina is not just an enthusiast but a true authority on electric bikes. Nestled in the coastal beauty of Virginia, Kristina has found the perfect backdrop for her passion for electric biking. As a dedicated wife and homeschooling mom, her life revolves around family, faith, and the thrill of adventure.
Originally hailing from Ohio, Kristina's journey with electric bikes began as a curiosity and quickly evolved into a deep expertise. Her blog is a testament to her love for electric biking, combining her fascination for eco-friendly transportation with her coastal lifestyle.
When she's not cruising the beach on her electric bike, you'll find Kristina indulging in her other loves: long walks along the shore, getting lost in a good book, and cherishing moments with her loved ones. With a heart as big as her love for animals, especially cats, Kristina brings a unique perspective to the electric bike world, grounded in her strong faith in God and her dedication to a sustainable lifestyle.
Through her blog, Kristina shares her extensive knowledge of electric bikes, offering valuable insights, tips, and recommendations to fellow enthusiasts. Whether you're a seasoned rider or a newcomer to the electric bike scene, Kristina's blog is your go-to source for all things electric biking, fueled by her passion, expertise, and the scenic beauty of coastal Virginia.
